← back to search

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

view on congress.gov

Policy area: Congress

Latest action 2025-04-08 · Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · showing text version Engrossed in House of 2025-04-08T04:00:00Z

Sponsor

Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5] (R-NC)

0 cosponsors

Recent actions

• 2025-04-08 — Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)
• 2025-04-08 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
• 2025-04-08 — On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
• 2025-04-08 — On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473)
• 2025-04-08 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
• 2025-04-08 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
• 2025-04-08 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
• 2025-04-08 — Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
• 2025-04-07 — The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
• 2025-04-07 — The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.

Subjects

• House of Representatives
• Legislative rules and procedure

Related bills

• NORRA of 2025
• SAVE Act
• Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 23) permitting parental remote voting by proxy, and for other purposes.
• Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
• Providing for the consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res 24, H.R. 1526, and H.R. 22.
• Providing for the announcement of pairs from a written list furnished to the Clerk, and for other purposes.
• A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions".
• A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".

Text sections (6 indexed passages)

• (untitled section)
• 2.
• 3.
• 4.
• 5.
• 6.